The next public sector security management edition of BriefingsDirect explores how managing IT for a rural Virginia county government means doing more with less -- even as the types and sophistication of cybersecurity threats grow.
For County of Caroline, a small team of IT administrators has built a technically advanced security posture that blends the right amounts of automation with flexible, cloud-based administration.
Here to share their story on improving security in a local government organization are Bryan Farmer, System Technician, and David Sadler, Director of Information Technology, both for County of Caroline in Bowling Green, Virginia. The discussion is moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.
Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Dave,
tell us about County of Caroline and your security requirements. What makes
security particularly challenging for a public sector organization like yours?
Sadler |
Sadler: As
everyone knows, small governments in the State
of Virginia -- and all across the United States and around the world -- are
being
targeted by a lot of bad guys. For that reason, we have the responsibility
to safeguard the data of the citizens of this county -- and also of the
customers and other people that we interact with on a daily basis. It’s a paramount
concern for us to maintain the security and integrity of that data so that we
have the trust of the people we work with.
Gardner: Do
you find that you are under attack more often than you used to be?
Sadler: The headlines
of nearly any major newspaper you see, or news broadcasts that you watch, show
what happens when the bad guys win and the local governments lose. Ransomware, for example, happens
every day. We have seen a major increase in these attacks, or attempted attacks,
over the past few years.
Gardner: Bryan,
tell us a bit about your IT organization. How many do you have on the
frontlines to help combat this increase in threats?
Farmer: You
have the pleasure today of speaking with the entire IT staff in our little neck
of the woods. It’s just the two of us. For the last several years it was a one-man
operation, and they brought me on board a little over a year-and-a-half ago to lend
a hand. As the county grew, and as the number of users and data grew, it just became
too much for one person to handle.
Gardner: You are
supporting how many people and devices with your organization?
Small-town support, high-tech security
Farmer |
Sadler: But the
number of devices that actually touch our private network is in the
neighborhood of around 750.
Farmer: We
are a rural area so we don’t have the luxury of having fiber in between all of
our locations and sites. So we have to resort to virtual private
networks (VPNs) to get traffic back and forth. There are airFiber connections, and we
are doing some stuff over the air. We are a mixed batch. There is a little bit
of everything here.
Gardner: Just as
any business, you have to put your best face forward to your citizens, voters, and
taxpayers. They are coming for public services, going online for important information.
How large is your county and what sort of applications and services you are
providing to your citizens?
Farmer: Our
population is 30,000?
Sadler: Probably
28,000 to 30,000 people, yes.
Farmer: A large
portion of our county is covered by a U.S. Army training base,
it’s a lot of nonliving area, so to speak. The population is condensed into a couple
of small areas.
We
host a web site and forum. People can look up their taxes, permit
prices, and basic information that the average citizen will need.
We host a web site and forum.
It’s not as robust as what you would find in a big city or a major metropolitan
area, but people can look up their taxes, permit prices, things of that nature;
basic information that the average citizen will need such as utility information.
Gardner: With
a potential of 30,000 end users -- and just two folks to help protect all of the
infrastructure, applications, and data -- automation and easy-to-use management
must be super important. Tell us where you were in your security posture before
and how you have recently improved on that.
Finding a detection solution
Sadler: Initially when I started here, and I came over from the private sector, we were running one of the big companies that had a huge name but was basically not showing us the right amount of good protection, you could say.
So we switched to a second
company, Kaspersky, and immediately we
started finding detections of existing malware and different anomalies in the
network that had existed for years without protection from Symantec. So we settled on Kaspersky. And
anytime you go to an enterprise-level antivirus (AV) endpoint solution, the setup,
adjustment, and on-boarding process takes longer than what a lot of people
would lead you to believe.
It took us about six months
with Kaspersky. I was by myself, so it took me about six months to get everything
set up and running like it should, and it performed extremely well. I had a lot
of granularity as far as control of firewalls and that type of product.
The granularity is what we
like because we have users that have a broad range of needs. We have to be able
to address all of those broad ranges under one umbrella.
Many
of the different AV endpoint solutions we evaluated lacked the
granularity we wanted to address the needs of everyone with one product.
We spend six months evaluating and we landed on Bitdefender.
Unfortunately, when the US Department of Homeland Security decided to at first recommend that you not use [Kaspersky] and then later banned that product from use, we were forced to look for a replacement solution, and we evaluated multiple different products.
Again, what we were looking
for was granularity because we wanted to be able to address the needs of
everyone under the umbrella with one particular product. Many of the different AV
endpoint solutions we evaluated lacked that granularity. It was, more or less, another
version of the software that we started with. They didn’t give a real high
level of protection or did not allow for adjustment.
When we started evaluating a
replacement, we were finding things that we could not do with a particular
product. We spent probably about six months evaluating different products -- and
then we landed on Bitdefender.
Now, coming from the private
sector and dealing with a lot of home users, my feelings for Bitdefender were based
on the reputation of their consumer-grade
product. They had an extremely good reputation in the consumer market. Right
off the bat, they had a higher score when we started evaluating. It doesn’t matter
how easy a product is to use or adjust if their basic detection level is low,
then everything else is a waste of time.
Bitdefender right off the bat
has had a reputation for having a high level of detection and protection as
well as a low impact on the systems. Being a small, rural county government, we
use machines that are unfortunately a little bit older than what would be
recommended, five to six years old. We are using some older machines that have
lower processing power, so we could not take a product that would kill the
performance of the machine and make it unusable.
During our evaluations we
found that Bitdefender performed well. It did not have a lot of system overhead
and it gave us a high level of protection. What’s really encouraging is when
you switch to a different product and you start scaling your network and find threats
that had been existing there for years undetected. Now you know at least you
are getting something for your money, and that’s what we found with
Bitdefender.
Gardner: I
have heard that many times. It has to, at the core, be really good at detecting.
All the other bells and whistles don’t count if that’s not the case. Once you
have established that you are detecting what’s been there, and what’s coming
down the wire every day, the administration does become important.
Bryan, what is the
administration like? How have you improved in terms of operations? Tell us about
the ongoing day-to-day life using Bitdefender.
Managing mission-critical tech
Farmer: We
are Bitdefender
GravityZone users. We host everything in the cloud. We don’t have any
on-premises Bitdefender machines, servers, or anything like that, and it’s nice.
Like Dave said, we have a wide range of users and those users have a wide range
of needs, especially with regards to Internet access, web page access, stuff
like that.
For example, a police officer
or an investigator needs to be able to access web sites that a clerk in the treasurer’s
office just doesn’t need to be able to access. To be able to sit at my desk or
take my laptop out anywhere that I have an Internet connection and make an
adjustment if someone cannot get to somewhere that they need is invaluable. It saves
so much time.
We don’t have to travel to
different sites. We don’t have to log-in to a server. I can make adjustments
from my phone. It’s wonderful to be able to set up these different profiles and
to have granular control over what a group of people can do.
We can adjust which programs they can run. We can remove printing from a network. There are so many different ways that we can do it, from anywhere as long as we have a computer and Internet access. Being able to do that is wonderful.
Gardner: Dave,
there is nothing more mission-critical than a public safety officer and their
technology. And that technology is so important to everybody today, including a
police officer, a firefighter, and an emergency medical technician (EMT). Any
feedback when it comes to the protection and the performance, particularly in
those mission-critical use cases?
Sadler:
Bitdefender has allowed us the granularity to be able to adjust so that we don’t
interfere with those mission-critical activities that the police officer or the
firefighter are trying to perform.
Our
security service is hosted in the cloud, and we have found that that is
an actual benefit. Bitdefender GravityZone offers us the capability to
monitor as well as adjust on machines that never see our network.
So initially there was an adjustment period. Thank goodness everybody was patient during that process and I think now we are finally -- about a year into the process, a little over a year -- and we have gotten stuff set pretty good. The adjustments that we are having to make now are minor. Like Bryan said, we don’t have an on-premises security server here. Our service is hosted in the cloud, and we have found that that is an actual benefit. Before, with having a security server and the software hosted on-premises, there were machines that didn’t touch the network. We are looking at probably 40 to 50 percent of our machines that we would have had to manage and protect [manually] because they never touch our network.
The Bitdefender GravityZone
cloud-based security product offers us the capability to be able to monitor for
detections, as well as adjust firewalls, etc., on machines that we never touch
or never see on our network. It’s been a really nice product for us and we are
extremely happy with its performance.
Gardner: Any
other metrics of success for a public sector organization like yours with a
small support organization? In a public sector environment you have to justify
your budget. When you tell the people overseeing your budget why this is a good
investment, what do you usually tell them?
Sadler: The
benefit we have here is that our bosses are aware of the need to secure the
network. We have cooperation from them. Because we are diligent in our
evaluation of different products, they pretty much trust our decisions.
Justifying or proving the need
for a security product has not been a problem. And again, the day-to-day
announcements that you see in the newspaper and on web sites about data
breaches or malware infections -- all that makes justifying such a product easier.
Gardner: Any
examples come to mind that have demonstrated the way that you like to use these
products and these services? Anything come to mind that illustrates why this
works well, particularly for your organization?
Stop, evaluate, and reverse infections
Farmer: Going
back to the cloud hosting, all a machine has to do is touch the Internet. We
have a machine in our office here right now that one of our safety officials
had and we received an email notification that something was going on. That
machine needed to be disinfected, we needed to take a look at this machine.
The end-user didn’t have to
notice it. We didn’t have to wait until it was a huge problem or a ransomware
thing or whatever the case may be. We were notified automatically in advance.
We were able to contact the user and get to the machine. Thankfully, we don’t think
it was anything super-critical, but it could have been.
That automation was fantastic, and not having to react so aggressively, so to speak. So the proactivity that a solution like Bitdefender offers is outstanding.
Gardner: Dave,
anything come to mind that illustrates some of the features or functions or
qualitative measurements that you like?
Sadler: Yes, with
Bitdefender GravityZone, it will sandbox a suspicious
activity and watch its actions and then roll back if something bad is going on.
We actually had a situation
where a vendor that we use on a regular basis from a large company,
well-respected, called in to support a machine that they had in one of our
offices. We were immediately notified via email that a ransomware attack was
being attempted.
We
were notified on our end that a ransomware attack had been stopped,
evaluated, and reversed by Bitdefender. Not once, but twice in a row. We
were immediately able to contact that office say, "Hey, stop what your
are doing."
So this vendor was using a remote desktop application. Somehow the end-user got directed to a bad site, and when it failed the first time on their end, all they could tell was, “Hey, my remote desktop software is not working.” They stopped and tried it again.
We were notified on our end
that a ransomware attack had been stopped, evaluated, and reversed by
Bitdefender. Not once, but twice in a row. So we were immediately able to
contact that office and say, “Hey, stop what you are doing.”
Then we followed up by
disconnecting that computer from the network and evaluating them for infection,
to make sure that everything had been reversed. Thank goodness, Bitdefender was
able to stop that ransomware attack and actually reverse the activity. We were
able to get a clean scan and return that computer back to service fairly
quickly.
Gardner: How
about looking to the future? What would you like to see next? How would you
improve your situation, and how could a vendor help you do that?
Meeting government requirements
Sadler: The
State of Virginia just passed a huge bill dealing
with election security and everybody knows that that’s a huge, hot topic
when it comes to security right now. And because most of the localities in
Virginia are independent localities, the state passed a bill that allows state Department of Elections and
the US Homeland Security Department to step in a little bit more to the local
governments and monitor or control the security of the local governments, which
in the end is going to be a good thing.
But a lot of the products or
solutions that we are now being required to be able to answer about are already
answered by the Bitdefender product. For example, automated patch management notification
of security issues.
So, Bitdefender right now is already
answering a lot of the new requirements. The one thing that I would like to see
… from what I understand the cloud-based version of Bitdefender does not allow
you to do mobile device management. And that’s going to be required by some of
these regulations that are coming down. So it would be really nice if we could
have one product that would do the mobile device management as well as the
cloud-based security protection for a network.
Gardner: I
imagine they hear you loud and clear on that. When it comes to compliance like
you are describing from a state down to a county, for example, many times there
are reports and audits that are required. Is that something that you feel is
supported well? Are you able to rise to that occasion already with what you
have installed?
Farmer: Yes, Bitdefender is a big part of us being able to remain compliant. The Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) audit is one we have to go through on a regular basis. Bitdefender helps us address a lot of the requirements of those audits as well as some of the upcoming audits that we haven’t seen yet that are going to be required by this new regulation that was just passed this past year in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
But from the previews that we
are getting on the requirements of those newly passed regulations, it does
appear that Bitdefender is going to be able to help us address some of those
needs, which is good. By far, it’s the capability to be able to answer some of
those needs with Bitdefender that is superior to the products that we have been
using in the past.
Gardner: Given
that many other localities, cities, towns, municipalities, counties are going
to be facing similar requirements, particularly around election security, for
example, what advice would you give them, now that you have been through this
process? What have you learned that you would share with them so that they can
perhaps have an easier go at it?
Research reaps benefits in time, costs
Farmer: I
have seen in the past a lot of places that look at the first line item, so to
speak, and then make a decision on that. Then when they get down the page a
little bit and see some of the other requirements, they end up in situations
where they have two, three, or four pieces of software, and a couple of
different pieces of hardware, working together to accomplish one goal. Certainly,
in our situation, Bitdefender checks a lot of different boxes for us. If we had
not taken the time to research everything properly and get into the full
breadth of what’s capable, we could have spent a lot more money and created a
lot more work and headaches for ourselves.
A lot of people in IT will already
know this, but you have to do your homework. You have to see exactly what you
need and get a wide-angle view of it and try to choose something that helps do
all of those things. Then automate off-site and automate as much as you can to try
to use your time wisely and efficiently.
Gardner: Dave,
any advice for those listening? What have you learned that you would share with
them to help them out?
The
breadth of the protection that we are getting from Bitdefender has been
a major plus. Find the product that your can put together under one big
umbrella so you have one point of adjustment from one single control
panel.
Sadler: The breadth of the protection that we are getting from Bitdefender has been a major plus. So again, like Bryan said, find the product that you can put together under one big umbrella -- so that you have one point of adjustment. For example, we are able to adjust firewalls, virus protection, and off-site USB protection -- all this from one single control panel instead of having to manage four or five different control panels for different products.
It’s been a positive move for
us, and we look forward to continuing to work with that product and we are watching
the new product still under development. We see new features coming out
constantly. So if anyone from Bitdefender is listening, keep up the good work.
We will hang in there with you and keep working.
But the main thing for IT operators is to evaluate your possibilities, evaluate whatever possible changes you are going to make before you do it. It can be an investment of money and time that goes wasted if you are not sure of the direction you are going in. Use a product that has a good reputation and one that checks off all the boxes like Bitdefender.
Farmer: In a
lot of these situations, when you are working with a county government or a
school you are not buying something for 30, 60, or 90 days – instead you are
buying a year at a time. If you make an uninformed decision, you could be
putting yourself in a jam time- and labor-wise for the next year. That stuff
has lasting effects. In most counties, we get our budgets and that’s what we have.
There are no do-overs on stuff like this. So, it speaks back to making a
well-informed decision the first time.
You may also be
interested in:
- SambaSafety’s mission to reduce risk begins in its own datacenter security partnerships
- How MSP StoredTech brings comprehensive security services to diverse clients using Bitdefender
- For a UK borough, solving security issues leads to operational improvements and cost-savings across its IT infrastructure
- How an Architectural Firm Retains Long-Term Security Confidence Across a Fully Virtualized and Distributed Desktop Environment
- Regional dental firm Great Expressions protects distributed data with lower complexity thanks to amalgam of Nutanix HCI and Bitdefender security
- How MSPs Leverage Bitdefender’s Layered Approach to Security for Comprehensive Client Protection
- How a large Missouri medical center developed an agile healthcare infrastructure security strategy
- Kansas Development Finance Authority gains peace of mind, end-points virtual shield using Hypervisor-level security
- How a Florida school district tames the Wild West of education security at scale and on budget
No comments:
Post a Comment