Thursday, September 26, 2013

Application development efficiencies drive Agile payoffs for healthcare tech provider TriZetto

Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: HP.

The next edition of the HP Discover Performance Podcast Series highlights how healthcare technology provider TriZetto has been improving its development processes and modernizing its ability to speed the applications lifecycle process.

To learn more about how quality and Agile methods tools better support a lifecycle approach to software, we sat down with Rubina Ansari, Associate Vice President of Automation and Software Development Lifecycle Tools at TriZetto.

The discussion, which took place at the recent HP Discover 2013 Conference in Las Vegas, is moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: HP is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Where you are in terms of moving to Agile processes?

Ansari: TriZetto currently is going through an evolution. We’re going through a structured waterfall-to-scaled-Agile methodology. As you mentioned, that's one of the innovative ways that we're looking at getting our releases out faster with better quality, and be able to respond to our customers. We realize that Agile, as a methodology, is the way to go when it comes to all those three things I just mentioned.

We're currently in the midst of evolving how we work. We’re going through a major transformation within our development centers throughout the country.

TriZetto is a healthcare software provider. We have the software for all areas of healthcare. Our mission is to integrate different healthcare systems to make sure our customers have seamless information. Over 50 percent of the American insured population goes through our software for their claims processing. So, we have a big market and we want to stay there.
Leaner and faster

Our software is very important to us, just as it is to our customers. We're always looking for ways of making sure we’re leaner, faster, and keeping up with our quality in order to keep up with all the healthcare changes that are happening.

Gardner: You've been working with HP Software and Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) products for some time. Tell us a little bit about what you have in place, and then let's learn a bit more about the Asset Manager capabilities that you're pioneering?

Ansari
Ansari: We've been using HP tools for our testing area, such as the QTP Products Performance Center and Quality Center. We’ve recently went ahead with ALM 11.5, it has a lot of cross-project abilities. As for agile, we're now using HP Agile Manager.

This has helped us move forward fairly quickly into scaled agile using HP Agile Manager, while integrating with our current HP tools. We wanted to make sure that our tools were integrated and that we didn’t lose that traceability and the effectiveness of having a single vendor to get all our data.

HP Agile Manager is very important to us. It's a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model, and it was very easy for us to implement within our company. There was no concept of installing, and the response that we get from HP has been very fast, as this is the first experience we’ve had with a SaaS deliverable from HP.
It's very lightweight, it's web-based SaaS and it integrates with their current tool suite.

They're following agile, so we get releases every three months. Actually, every few weeks, we get enhancements for defects we may find within their product. It's worked out very well. It's very lightweight, it's web-based SaaS and it integrates with their current tool suite, which was vital to us.

We have between 500 and 1,000 individuals that make up development teams throughout United States. For Agile Manager, the last time we checked, it was approximately 400. We're hoping to get up to 1,000 by end of this year, so that way everyone is using Agile Manager for all their agile/scrum teams and their backlogs and development.
Gardner: Do you have any sense of how much faster you're able to develop? What are the paybacks in terms of quality, traceability, and tracking defects? What's the payback from doing this in the way you have?

Working together

Ansari: We’ve seen some, but I think the most is yet to come in rolling this out. One of the things that Agile Manager promotes is collaboration and working together in a scrum team. Agile Manager, having the software work all around the agile processes, makes it very easy for us to roll an agile methodology.

This has helped us collaborate better between testers and developers, and we're finding those defects earlier, before they even happen. We’ll have more hard metrics around this as we roll this out further. One of the major reasons we went with HP Agile Manager is that it has very good integration with the development tools we use.

They integrate with several development tools, allowing our testers to be able to see what changes occurred, what piece of code has changed for each defect enhancement that the tester would be testing. So that tight integration with other development tools was a very pivotal factor in our decision of going forward with that HP Agile Manager.

Gardner: So Rubina, not only are you progressing from waterfall to agile and adopting more up-to-date tools, but you’ve made this leap to a SaaS-based delivery for this. If that's working out well as you’ve said, do you think this is going to lead to doing more with other SaaS tools and tests and capabilities and maybe even look at cloud platform as a service opportunity?
We're also looking at offering some of our products in a SaaS model. So we realize what's involved in it.

Ansari: Absolutely. This was our first experience and it is going very well. Of course, there were some learning curves and some learning pains. Being able to get these changes so quickly and not having it do it ourselves was kind of a mind shift change for us. We're reaping the benefits from it obviously, but we did have to have a little more scheduled conversations, release notes, and documentation about changes from HP.

We're not new to SaaS. We're also looking at offering some of our products in a SaaS model. So we realize what's involved in it. It was great to be on the receiving end of a SaaS product, knowing that TriZetto themselves are playing that space as well.

There's always so much more to improve. What we’re looking for is how to quickly respond to our customers. That means also integrating HP Service Manager and any other tools that may be part of this software testing lifecycle or part of our ability to release or offer something to our clients.
We'll continue doing this until there is no more space for efficiency. But, there are always places where we can be even more effective.

The technologies that we’re advancing toward as well will allow us to easily go into the mobile space once we plan and do that.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: HP.

You may also be interested in:

at 4:36 PM 0 comments

Monday, September 23, 2013

Navicure gains IT capacity optimization and performance monitoring using VMware vCenter Operations Manager

Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

The next VMworld innovator interview focuses on how a fast-growing healthcare claims company is gaining better control and optimization across its IT infrastructure. Learn how IT leaders at Navicure have been deploying a comprehensive monitoring and operational management approach.

To understand how they're taming IT complexity as they set the stage to adopt the latest in cloud-computing and virtualization infrastructure developments, join Donald Wilkins, Director of Information Technology at Navicure Inc. in Duluth, Georgia.

The discussion, which took place at the recent 2013 VMworld Conference in San Francisco, is moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Why is your organization so focused on taming complexity?

Wilkins
Wilkins: At Navicure, we've been focused on scaling a fast-growing business. And if you incorporate very complex infrastructure, it becomes more difficult to scale it. So we're focused on technologies that are simple to implement, yet have a lot of upward availability of growth from the storage, the infrastructure, and the software we use. We do that in order to be able to scale that growth we needed to satisfy our business objectives.

Gardner: Tell us a little bit about Navicure, what you do, how is that you're growing, and why that's putting a burden on your IT systems.

Wilkins: Navicure has been around for about 12 years. We started the company in about 2001 and delivered the product to our customers in the late 2001-2002 time-frame. We've been growing very fast. We're adding 20 to 30 employees every year, and we're up to about 230 employees today.

We have approximately 50,000 physicians on our system. We're growing at a rate of 8,000 to 10,000 physicians a year, and it’s a healthy growth. We don't want to grow too fast, so as not to water down our products and services, but at the same time, we want to grow at a pace that better enables us to deliver better products for our customers.

Revenue cycle management

Claim clearinghouses have been around for a couple of decades now. We've evolved from that claim-clearinghouse model to what we refer to as revenue cycle management. We pioneered that term early as we started the company.

We take the transactions from physicians and send them to the insurance companies. That’s what the clearinghouse model is. But on that product, we added a lot of value-added services, a lot analytics around those transactions to help the provider generate more revenue for their transactions. They get paid faster, and that they get paid the first time through the system.

It was very costly for transactions to be delayed weeks because of poorly submitted transactions to the insurance company or denials because they coded something wrong.

We try to catch all that, so that they get paid the first time through. That’s the return on investment (ROI) that our customers are looking for when they look at our products, to lower the AR days and to increase their revenue at the bottom line.

Customer service is one of the foundation cornerstones of our business. We feel that our customers are number one, and retaining those customers is one of our primary goals. 
We wanted to build a foundational structure that we can just build on as we get go into business and growing the transaction volume.

Gardner: Tell us a little bit about your IT environment.

Wilkins: The first thing we did at Navicure, when we started the company, is we looked at and decided that we didn't want to be in the data-center business. We wanted to use a colo that does that work at a much higher level than we could ever do. We wanted to focus on our product and let the colo focus on what they do.

They serve us from our infrastructure standpoint, and then we can focus on our products and build a good product. With that, we adopted very early on, the grid approach or the rack approach. This means that we wanted to build a foundational structure that we can just build on as we get go into business and grow the transactions volume.

That terminology has changed over the years, and that can be referred to a software-defined infrastructure today, but back then it was that we wanted to build infrastructure that would have a grid approach to it, so we could plug in more modules and components to add to scale out as we scale up.

With that, we continued to evolve what we do, but that inherent structure is still there. We need to be able to scale our business as our transactional volume doubles approximately every two years.

Gardner: And how did you begin your path to virtualization, and how did that progress into this more of a software-defined environment?

Ramping up fast

Wilkins: In the first few years of the operation of the company, we really had enough headroom in our infrastructure that it wasn't a big issue, but as we got four years into the company, we started realizing that we were going to hit a point where we would have to start ramping-up really fast.

Consolidation was not something that we had to worry about, because we didn’t have a lot to consolidate. It was a very early product, and we had to build the customer base. We had to build our reputation in the industry, and we did that. But then we started adding physicians by the thousands to our system every year.

With that, we started to have to add infrastructure. Virtualization came along at such a time that we could add it virtually faster and more efficiently than we could ever have if we added physical infrastructure.

So it became a product that we put in a test, dev, and production all at the same time, but it was something that just allowed us to meet the demands of the business.
We want to evolve that to be more proactive in our approach to monitoring.

Gardner: Of course, as many organizations have used virtualization to their benefit, they've also recognized that there is some complexity involved. And getting better management means further optimization, which further reduces costs. That also, of course, maintains their performance requirements. How did you then focus in on managing and optimizing this over time?

Wilkins: Well, one of the things we tried to look at, when we look at products and services, was to keep it simple. I have a very limited staff, and the staff needs to be able to drive to the point of whatever issue they're researching and/or inspecting.

As we've added technologies and services, we tried to add those that are very simple to scale, very, very simple to operate. We look at all these different tools to make that happen. This has led us to new products like VMware as they have also tried to drive to the same level, trying to simplify their product offering with their new products.

For years, we've been doing monitoring with other tools that were network-based monitoring tools. Those drive only so much value. They give us things like up-time alerting and responsiveness that are just about when issues happen. We want to evolve that to be more proactive in our approach to monitoring.
It’s not so much about how we can fix a problem when there is one. It’s more of, let’s keep the problem from happening to start with. That's where we've looked at some products for that. Recently we've actually implemented vCenter Operations Manager.

That product gives us a different twist that other SMNP monitoring tools do. It's a history of what's going on, but also a future analysis of that history and how it will change, based on our historical trends.

New line-up

Gardner: Of course, here at VMworld, we're hearing vSphere improvements and upgrades, but also the arrival of VMware vCloud Suite 5.5 and VMware vSphere with Operations Management 5.5. Is there anything in the new line-up that is particularly of interest to you, and have you had a chance to look at over?

Wilkins: I haven’t had a chance to look over the most recent offering, but we're running the current version. Again, for us, it's the efficiency mechanism inside the product that drives the most value for us to make sure that we can budget a year in advance of the expanding infrastructure that we need to have to meet the demands.

vCenter Operations Manager is key to understanding your infrastructure. If you don’t have it today, you're going to be very reactive to some of your pains and the troubles you're dealing with.

That product, while it does allow you to do a lot of research for various problems and services to drill down from the cluster level, down into the virtual machine levels and find out where your problems and pain points or, actually allows you to more quickly isolate the issue. At the same time, it allows you to project where you're growing and where you need to put your money into resources, whether that's more storage, compute resources, or network resources.

That's where we're seeing value out of the product, because it allows me to go during budget cycles to say that looking at infrastructure and our current growth, we will be out of resources by this time. We need to add this much, based on our current growth. Barring additional new products and services we may be coming up with, we may be adding to our service, if we don't do anything today. We're growing at this pace and here's the numbers to prove it.

When you have that information in front of you, you can actually build a business case around that that further educates the CFOs and the finance people to understanding what your troubles are and what you have to deal with on a day-to-day basis to operate the business.

Gardner: What sort of paybacks are there when you do this right?

Wilkins: Just being able to drive more density in our colo by being virtualized is a big value for us. Our footprint is relatively small. As for an actual dollar amount, it’s hard to pin something on there. We're growing so fast, we're trying to keep up with the demand, and we've been meeting that and exceeding that.
Desktop virtualization is going to be a critical component for that.

Really, the ROI is that our customers aren’t experiencing major troubles with our infrastructure not expanding fast enough. That's our goal, to drive high availability for infrastructure and low downtime, and we can do that with VMware and with their products and service.

We're a current customer of Site Recovery Manager. That's a staple in our virtual infrastructure and has been since 2008. We've been using that product for many years. It drives all of the planning and the testing of our virtual disaster recovery (DR) plan. I've been a very big proponent of that product and services for years, and we couldn’t do without it.

There are other products we will be looking at. Desktop virtualization is something that will be incorporated into the infrastructure in the next year or two.

As a small business, the value of that becomes a little harder to prove from a dollar standpoint. Some of those features like remote working come into play as office space continues to be expensive. It's something we will be looking at to expand our operations, especially as we have more remote employees working. Desktop virtualization is going to be a critical component for that.

Gardner: How about some 20/20 hindsight. If there were other folks that were ramping up on virtualization, or getting to the point where complexity was becoming an issue for them, do you have any thoughts on getting started or lessons learned that you could share?

Trusted partner

Wilkins: The best thing with virtualization is to get a trusted partner to help you get over the hurdle of the technical issues that may bring themselves to light.

I had a very trusted partner when I started this in 2005-2006. They actually just sat with me and worked with me, with no compensation whatsoever, to help work through virtualization. They made it such an easy value that it just became, "I've got to do this, because there's no way I can sustain this level of operational expense and of monitoring and managing this infrastructure, if it's all physical."

So, seeing that value proposition from a partner is key, but it has to be a trusted partner. It has to be a partner that has your best interest in mind, and not so much a new product to sell. It’s going to be somebody that brings a lot to the table, but, at the same time, helps you help yourself and lets you learn these products, so that you can actually implement it and research it on your own to see what value you can bring into the company.
It has to be a partner that has your best interest in mind, and not so much a new product to sell.

It’s easy for somebody to tell you how you can make your life better, but you have to actually see it, because then, you become a passionate person for the technology, and then you become a person that realizes you have to do this and will do whatever it takes to get this in here, because it will make your life easier.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:

at 4:14 PM 0 comments

IT technology trends -- a risky business?


This guest post comes courtesy of Patty Donovan, Vice President, Membership & Events, at The Open Group and a member of its executive management team.

By Patty Donovan

On Wednesday, September 25, The Open Group will host a tweet jam looking at a multitude of emerging/converging technology trends and the risks they present to organizations who have already adopted or are looking to adopt them. Most of the technology concepts we’re talking about – Cloud, Big Data, BYOD/BYOS, the Internet of Things, etc – are not new, but organizations are at differing stages of implementation and do not yet fully understand the longer term impact of adoption.

Donovan
This tweet jam will allow us to explore some of these technologies in more detail and look at how organizations may better prepare against potential risks – whether this is in regards to security, access management, policies, privacy or ROI. As discussed in our previous Open Platform 3.0 tweet jam, new technology trends present many opportunities but can also present business challenges if not managed effectively. [Disclosure: The Open Group is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Please join us on Wednesday, September 25 at 9:00 a.m. PT/12:00 p.m. ET/5:00 p.m. BST for a tweet jam that will discuss and debate the issues around technology risks. A number of key areas will be addressed during the discussion including: Big Data, Cloud, Consumerization of IT, the Internet of Things and mobile and social computing with a focus on understanding the key risk priority areas organizations face and ways to mitigate them.

We welcome Open Group members and interested participants from all backgrounds to join the session and interact with our panel thought leaders led by David Lounsbury, CTO and Jim Hietala, VP of Security, from The Open Group. To access the discussion, please follow the #ogChat hashtag during the allotted discussion time.
This tweet jam will allow us to explore some of these technologies in more detail and look at how organizations may better prepare against potential risks
  • Do you feel prepared for the emergence/convergence of IT trends? – Cloud, Big Data, BYOD/BYOS, Internet of things
  • Where do you see risks in these technologies? – Cloud, Big Data, BYOD/BYOS, Internet of things
  • How does your organization monitor for, measure and manage risks from these technologies?
  • Which policies are best at dealing with security risks from technologies? Which are less effective?
  • Many new technologies move data out of the enterprise to user devices or cloud services. Can we manage these new risks? How?
  • What role do standards, best practices and regulations play in keeping up with risks from these & future technologies?
  • Aside from risks caused by individual trends, what is the impact of multiple technology trends converging (Platform 3.0)?
And for those of you who are unfamiliar with tweet jams, here is some background information:

What Is a Tweet Jam?

A tweet jam is a one hour “discussion” hosted on Twitter. The purpose of this tweet jam is to share knowledge and answer questions on emerging/converging technology trends and the risks they present. Each tweet jam is led by a moderator and a dedicated group of experts to keep the discussion flowing. The public (or anyone using Twitter interested in the topic) is encouraged to join the discussion.

Participation Guidance

Whether you’re a newbie or veteran Twitter user, here are a few tips to keep in mind:
  • Have your first #ogChat tweet be a self-introduction: name, affiliation, occupation.
  • Start all other tweets with the question number you’re responding to and the #ogChat hashtag.
    • Sample: “Big Data presents a large business opportunity, but it is not yet being managed effectively internally – who owns the big data function? #ogchat”
    • Please refrain from product or service promotions. The goal of a tweet jam is to encourage an exchange of knowledge and stimulate discussion.
    • While this is a professional get-together, we don’t have to be stiff! Informality will not be an issue!
    • A tweet jam is akin to a public forum, panel discussion or Town Hall meeting – let’s be focused and thoughtful.


If you have any questions prior to the event or would like to join as a participant, please direct them to Rob Checkal (rob.checkal at hotwirepr.com). We anticipate a lively chat and hope you will be able to join!

This guest post comes courtesy of Patty Donovan, Vice President, Membership & Events, at The Open Group and a member of its executive management team.

You may also be interested in:

at 3:44 PM 0 comments

Friday, September 20, 2013

Are you ready for the convergence of new disruptive technologies?

The following guest post comes courtesy of Dr. Chris Harding, Director of Interoperability and SOA at The Open Group.

By Chris Harding

The convergence of technical phenomena such as cloud, mobile and social computing, big data analysis, and the Internet of things that is being addressed by The Open Group’s Open Platform 3.0 Forum will transform the way that you use information technology. Are you ready? Take our survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/convergent_tech

What the technology can do

Mobile and social computing are leading the way. Recently, the launch of new iPhone models and the announcement of the Twitter stock flotation were headline news, reflecting the importance that these technologies now have for business. For example, banks use mobile text messaging to alert customers to security issues. Retailers use social media to understand their markets and communicate with potential customers.

Harding
Other technologies are close behind. In Formula One motor racing, sensors monitor vehicle operation and feed real-time information to the support teams, leading to improved design, greater safety, and lower costs. This approach could soon become routine for cars on the public roads too. (Disclosure: The Open Group is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Many exciting new applications are being discussed. Stores could use sensors to capture customer behavior while browsing the goods on display, and give them targeted information and advice via their mobile devices. Medical professionals could monitor hospital patients and receive alerts of significant changes. Researchers could use shared cloud services and big data analysis to detect patterns in this information, and develop treatments, including for complex or uncommon conditions that are hard to understand using traditional methods. The potential is massive, and we are only just beginning to see it.

What the analysts say

Market analysts agree on the importance of the new technologies.

Gartner uses the term “Nexus of Forces” to describe the convergence and mutual reinforcement of social, mobility, cloud and information patterns that drive new business scenarios, and says that, although these forces are innovative and disruptive on their own, together they are revolutionizing business and society, disrupting old business models and creating new leaders.

IDC predicts that a combination of social cloud, mobile, and big data technologies will drive around 90% of all the growth in the IT market through 2020, and uses the term “third platform” to describe this combination.

The Open Group will identify the standards that will make Gartner’s Nexus of Forces and IDC’s Third Platform commercial realities. This will be the definition of Open Platform 3.0.

Disrupting enterprise use of IT

The new technologies are bringing new opportunities, but their use raises problems. In particular, end users find that working through IT departments in the traditional way is not satisfactory. The delays are too great for rapid, innovative development. They want to use the new technologies directly – “hands on."

Increasingly, business departments are buying technology directly, by-passing their IT departments. Traditionally, the bulk of an enterprise’s IT budget was spent by the IT department and went on maintenance. A significant proportion is now spent by the business departments, on new technology.
Business analysts are increasingly using technical tools, and even doing application development, using exposed APIs.

Business and IT are not different worlds any more. Business analysts are increasingly using technical tools, and even doing application development, using exposed APIs. For example, marketing folk do search engine optimization, use business information tools, and analyze traffic on Twitter. Such operations require less IT skill than formerly because the new systems are easy to use. Also, users are becoming more IT-savvy. This is a revolution in business use of IT, comparable to the use of spreadsheets in the 1980s.

Also, business departments are hiring traditional application developers, who would once have only been found in IT departments.

Are you ready?

These disruptive new technologies are changing, not just the IT architecture, but also the business architecture of the enterprises that use them. This is a sea change that affects us all.

The introduction of the PC had a dramatic impact on the way enterprises used IT, taking much of the technology out of the computer room and into the office. The new revolution is taking it out of the office and into the pocket. Cell phones and tablets give you windows into the world, not just your personal collection of applications and information. Through those windows you can see your friends, your best route home, what your customers like, how well your production processes are working, or whatever else you need to conduct your life and business.
You must learn how to tailor and combine the information and services available to you, to meet your personal objectives.

This will change the way you work. You must learn how to tailor and combine the information and services available to you, to meet your personal objectives. If your role is to provide or help to provide IT services, you must learn how to support users working in this new way.

To negotiate this change successfully, and take advantage of it, each of us must understand what is happening, and how ready we are to deal with it.

The Open Group is conducting a survey of people’s reactions to the convergence of Cloud and other new technologies. Take the survey, to input your state of readiness, and get early sight of the results, to see how you compare with everyone else.

To take the survey, visit https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/convergent_tech

The following guest post comes courtesy of Dr. Chris Harding, Director of Interoperability and SOA at The Open Group.

You may also be interested in:

at 12:07 PM 0 comments

Thursday, September 19, 2013

How MZI HealthCare identifies big data patient productivity gems using HP Vertica

Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: HP.

The next edition of the HP Discover Performance Podcast Series details how a healthcare solutions provider leverages big-data capabilities.

Learn how MZI Healthcare has deployed the HP Vertica Analytics Platform to help their customers better understand population healthcare trends and identify how well healthcare processes are working.

To discover more about how high-performance and cost-effective big-data processing forms a foundational element to improving overall healthcare quality and efficiency, join Greg Gootee, Product Manager at MZI Healthcare, based in Orlando. The discussion, which took place at the recent HP Vertica Big Data Conference in Boston, is moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: HP is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]
 
Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: How important is big data turning out to be for how healthcare is being administered?

Gootee: Change in healthcare is really dramatic, maybe more dramatic than any other industry has ever been. If you look at other industries where they have actually been able to spread that change over time, in healthcare it's being rapidly accelerated.

Gootee
In the past, data had been stored in multiple systems and multiple areas on given patients. It's been difficult for providers and organizations to make informed decisions about that patient and their healthcare. So we see a lot of change in being able to bring that data together and understand it better.

Gardner: Tell us about MZI, what you do, who your customers are, and where you're going to be taking this big data ability in the future.

Gootee: MZI Healthcare has predominantly been working on the payer side. We have a product that's been on the market for over 25 years helping with benefit administration and the lines of payers and different independent physician associations (IPAs) and third-party administrators (TPAs).

Our customers have always had a very tough time bringing in data from different sources. A little over two years ago, MZI decided to look at how we could leverage that data to help our customers better understand their risk and their patients, and ultimately change the outcomes for those patients.

Predictive analysis

Gardner: I think that's how the newer regulatory environment is lining up in terms of compensation. This is about outcomes, rather than procedures. Tell us about your requirements for big data in order to start doing more of that predictive analysis.

Gootee: If you think about how data has been stored in the past for patients across their continuum of care, where, as they went from facility to facility, and physician to physician, it's really been so spread apart. It's been difficult to help understand even how the treatments are affecting that patient.

I've talked a lot about my aunt in previous interviews. Last year, she went into a coma, not because the doctors weren't doing the right thing, but because they were unable to understand what the other doctors were doing.

She went to many specialists and took medication from each one of those to help with her given problem, but what happened was there was an interaction with medication. They didn't even know if she’d come out of the coma.

These things happen every day. Doctors make informed decisions from their experience and the data that they have. So it's critical that they can actually see all the information that's available to them.

When we look at healthcare and how it's changing, for example the Affordable Care Act, one of the main focuses is obviously cost. We all know that healthcare is growing at a rate that's just unsustainable, and while that's the main focus, it's different this time.
Not only are we trying to reduce cost, but we are trying to increase the care that's given to those patients.

We've done that before. In the Clinton Administration we had a kind of HMO and it really made a dramatic difference on cost. It was working, but it didn't give people a choice. There was no basis on outcomes, and the quality of care wasn't there.

This time around, that's probably the major difference. Not only are we trying to reduce cost, but we are trying to increase the care that's given to those patients. That's really vital to making the healthcare system a better system throughout the United States.

Gardner: Given the size of the data, the disparate nature of the data, more-and-more human data will be brought to bear. What were your technical requirements, and what was the journey that you took in finding the right infrastructure?

Gootee: We had a couple of requirements that were critical. When we work with small- and medium-size organizations (SMBs), they really don't have the funds to put in a large system themselves. So our goal was that we wanted to do something similar to what Apple has done with the iPhone. We wanted to take multiple things, put them into one area, and reduce that price point for our customers.

One of the critical things that we wanted to look at was overall price point. That included how we manage those systems and, when we looked at Vertica, one of the things that we found very appealing was that the management of that system is minimal.

High-end analytics

The other critical thing was speed, being able to deliver high-end analytics at the point of care, instead of two or three months later, and Vertica really produced. In fact, we did a proof of concept with them. It was almost unbelievable some of the queries that ran and the speed at which that data came back to us.

You hear things like that and see it through the conference, no matter what volume you may have. It's very good. Those were some of our requirements, and we were able to put that in the cloud. We run in the Amazon cloud and we were able to deliver that content to the people that need it at the right time at a really low price point.

Gardner: Let me understand also the requirement for concurrency. If you have this posted on Amazon Web Services, you're then opening this up to many different organizations and many different queriers. Is there an issue for the volume of queries happening simultaneously, or concurrency? Has that been something you've been able to work through?

Gootee: That's another value add that we get. The ability to expand and scale the Vertica system along with the scalability that we get with the Amazon allows us to deliver that information. No matter what type of queries we're getting, we can expand that automatically. We can grow that need, and it really makes a large difference in how we could be competitive in the marketplace.

Gardner: I suppose another dynamic to this on the economic side is the predictability of your cost.
Cloud services take some of that unknown away. It lets you scale as you need it and scale back if you don't need it.

Gootee: If you look at traditional ways that we've delivered software or a content before, you always over-buy, because you don’t know what it's going to be. Then, at some point, you don't have enough resources to deliver. Cloud services take some of that unknown away. It lets you scale as you need it and scale back if you don't need it.

So it's the flexibility for us. We're not a large company, and what's exciting about this is that these technologies help us do the same thing that the big guys do. It really lets our small company compete in a larger marketplace.

Gardner: Going to the population health equation and the types of data and information, is this something that's of interest to you? How important is this ability to get at all the information in all the different formats as you move forward?

Gootee: That's very critical for us. The way we interact in America and around the world has changed a lot. The HP HAVEn platform provides us with some opportunities to improve on what we have with healthcare's big security concerns, and the issue of the mobility of data. Getting it anywhere is critical to us, as well as better understanding how that data is changing.

We've heard from a lot of companies here that really are driving that user experience. More-and-more companies are going to be competing on how they can deliver things to a user in the way that they like it. That's critical to us, and that [HP] platform really gives us the ability to do that.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: HP.

You may also be interested in:

at 11:51 AM 0 comments

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Synthetic APIs approach improves fragmented data acquisition for Thomson Reuters’ content sharing platform

Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: Kapow Software, a Kofax company.

The next BriefingsDirect innovator interview examines the improved data use benefits at Thomson Reuters in London.

Part of a discussion series on how innovative companies are dodging data complexity through the use of Synthetic APIs, learn here how, from across many different industries and regions of the globe, inventive companies are able to get the best information delivered to those who can act on it with speed and at massive scale.

Here to explain how improved information integration and delivery can be made into business success, we're joined by Pedro Saraiva, product manager for Content Shared Platforms and Rapid Sourcing at Thomson Reuters. The discussion is moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: Kapow Software is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: You first launched Thomson Reuters content-sharing platform over four years ago after joining the company in 1996. And the platform there now enables agile delivery of automated content-acquisition solutions across a range of content areas. What are you delivering and to whom?

Saraiva: It's actually very simple. We're a business that requires a lot of information, a lot of data because our business is information -- intelligence information, and we need to do that in a cost-efficient manner. Part of that requires us to have the best technology. When we started four years ago, one of the most obvious patterns that we found was that we had a lot of fragmentation of our content acquisition processes where they were based, who was doing them, and more importantly, what processes they were following or not following.

Saraiva
The opportunity that we immediately saw was to consolidate it all, not just around the central capability, but into an optimal capability, with real experts around it making it work and effectively creating a platform as a service (PaaS) for our internal experts in each content area to perform their tasks just as usual, but faster, better, more reliably, and more consistently.

Fundamentally, we are a platform for web-content acquisition. And that is part of our content-shared platform because it's all part of a bigger picture, where we take content from so many sources and many different kinds of sources, and not just web.

Content management

I don't know the exact percentage, but I would guess that about half of what we do is content management, rather than site technology, per se. And a lot of those content management tasks are highly specialized because that's the only way we're going to add value. We're going to understand the content, where it comes from, what it means, and we are going to present it and structure it in the best possible way for our customers.

So, the needs of our internal groups and internal content teams are huge, very demanding, and very specialized. But they all have certain things in common. We found many of them were using Excel macros or some other technologies to perform their activities.

We tried to capture what was common, in spite of all that diversity, to leverage the best possible value from the technology that we have. But also, from our know-how, expertise, and best practices around how to source content, how to be compliant with the required rules, and producing consistent, high-quality data that we could trust, we could claim to our customers that they could trust our content because we know exactly what happened to it from beginning to the end.

Gardner: Thomson Reuters is a large company. Tell us how large, and tell us some numbers around the number of different units within the company that you are providing this data to.

Saraiva: We have about 50,000 employees worldwide in the majority of countries. For example, our news operations have reporters on the ground throughout the world.

We have all languages represented, both internally and in terms of our customers, and the content that we provide to our customers. We're a truly diverse organization.
It takes shape in the vast number of different teams we have specializing in one kind of content.

We have a huge number of individual groups organized around the types of customers that we serve. Are they global? Are they regional? Are they local? Are they large organizations? Are they small organizations? Are they hedge funds? Are they fund managers? Are they investment banks? Are they analysts? We have a variety of customers that we serve within each of our customer organizations around the world.

And that degree of specialty that I mentioned earlier, at some point, has to take shape. It takes shape in the vast number of different teams we have specializing in one kind of content. It may be, perhaps, just a language, French or Chinese. It may be fundamentals, versus real-time data. We have to have the expertise and the centers of excellence for each of those areas, so that we really understand the content.

Gardner: You had massive redundancy in how people would go about this task of getting information from the web. It probably was costly. When you decided that you wanted to create a platform and have a centralized approach to doing this, what were the decisions that you made around technology? What were some of the hurdles that you had to overcome?

Saraiva:  We were looking for a platform that we would be able to support and manage in a cost-effective manner. We were looking for something that we could trust and rely on. We were looking for something that our users could make sense of and actually be productive with. So, that was relatively simple.

The biggest challenge, in my opinion, from the start, was the fact that it's very hard to take a big organization with an inherently fragmented set of operating units and try to change it, because trying to introduce a single, central capability. It sounds great on paper, but when you start trying to persuade your users that there's value to them in in migrating their current processes, they'll be concerned that the change is not in their interest.

Demonstrating value

And there is a degree of psychology at work in trying to not only work with that reluctance that all businesses have to face, but also to influence it positively and try to demonstrate that value to our end users was far in excess to the threat that they perceived.

I can think of examples that are truly amazing, in my opinion. One is about the agility that we've gained through the introduction of technology such as this one, and not just the user of that technology, but the optimal use of it. Some time ago, before RSA was used in some departments, we had important customers who had an urgent, desperate need for a piece of information that we happened not to have, for whatever reason. It happens all the time.
We tried to politely explain that it might take us a while, because it would have to go through a development team that traditionally build C++ components. They were a small team and they were very busy. They had other priorities. Ultimately, that little request, for us, was a small part of everything we were trying to do. For that customer, it was the most important thing.

The conversation to explain why it was going to take so long why we were not giving them the importance that they deserved was a difficult conversation to have. We wanted to be better than that. Today, you can build a robot quickly. You can do it and plug it into the architecture that we have so that the customer can very quickly see it appearing almost real time in their product. That's an amazing change.
But ultimately, most importantly, we needed the confidence that we could get our job done.

Gardner: What was the story behind your adoption of this?

Saraiva: We spent some time looking at the technologies available. We spoke with a number of other customers and other people we knew. We did our own research, including a little bit of the shotgun kind of research that you tend to do on the Internet, trying to find what's available. Very quickly, we had a short list of five technologies or so.

All of them promised to be great, but ultimately, they had to pass the acid test, which was evaluation in terms of our technical operations experts. Is this something that we are able to run? And also in terms of the capabilities we were expecting. They were quite demanding, because we had a variety of users that we needed to cater to.

But ultimately, most importantly, we needed the confidence that we could get our job done. If we are going to invest in a given technology, we want to know that it can be used to solve a given kind of problem without too much fuss, complexity, or delay, because if that doesn't happen, you have a problem. You have only partially achieved the promise, and you will forever be chasing alternatives to fill that gap.

Kapow absolutely gives us that kind of confidence. Our developers, who at first had a little bit of skepticism about the ability of a tool to be so amazing, tried it. After the first robot, typically, their reaction was "Wow." They love it, because they know they can do their job. And that's what we all want. We want to be able to do our jobs. Our customers want to use our products to do their jobs. We're all in the same kind of game. We just need to be very, very good at what we do. Kapow gave us that.

Critically important

With Kapow, it was a straightforward process. We just click, follow the process that really mirrors a complex workflow in the flow chart that we designed, and the job is done.
In terms of the rapid development of the solutions, it was at least a reduction from several months to weeks. And this is typical. You have cases where it's much faster. You have cases where it's slower, because there are complex, high-risk automation processes that we need to take some time to test. But the development process is shortened dramatically.

Gardner: We were recently at the Kapow User Summit. We've been hearing about newer versions, the Kapow platform 9.2. Is there anything in particular that you've heard here so far that has piqued your interest? Something you might be able to apply to some of these problems right away?

Saraiva: A lot of what we've been doing and focusing on over the last four years was around a pattern whereby we have data flowing into the company, being processed and transformed. We're adding our value, and it's flowing out to our customers. There is, however, another type of web sourcing and acquisition that we're now beginning to work with which is more interactive. It's more about the unpredictable, unplanned need for information on demand.
The main advantage of a cloud-based service running Kapow would be in freeing us from the hassle of having to manage our own infrastructure.

There, interestingly, we have the problem of integrating the button that produces that fetch for data into the end-user workflows. That was something that was not possible with previous versions of Kapow or not straightforward. We would have to build our own interfaces, our own queues, and our own API to interface with the robo-server.

Now, with Kapplets it all looks very, very straightforward because we can easily see that we could have an arbitrary optimized workflow solution or tool for some of our users that happens to embed a Kapplet that allows a user to perform research on demand, perhaps on the customer, perhaps on a company for the kind of data that we wouldn't traditionally be acquiring data on a constant fixed basis.
 
Gardner: Any advice that you might offer to others who are grappling with similar issues around multiple data sources, not being able to use APIs, needing a synthetic API approach?
I've been amazed at what is possible with technologies such as Kapow.

Saraiva: I suppose the most important message I would want to share is about confidence in technology. When I started this, I had worked for years in technology, many of those years in web technology, some complex web technology. And yet, when I started thinking about web content acquisition, I didn't really think it could be done very well.

I thought this is going to be a challenge, which is partly the reason why I was interested in it. And I've been amazed at what is possible with technologies such as Kapow. So, my message would be don't worry that technology such as Kapow will not be able to do the job for you. Don't fear that you will be better off using your own bespoke C++ based solution. Go for it, because it really works. Go for it and make the most of it, because you will need it with so much data, especially on the Internet. You have to have that.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: Kapow Software, a Kofax company.

You may also be interested in:

at 3:11 PM 0 comments

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

When real-time is no longer good enough, the predictive business emerges

Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: SAP Cloud.

The next BriefingsDirect thought leadership discussion defines a momentous shift in business strategy. Join an SAP Cloud executive as we explore the impact that big data, cloud computing, and mobility are having in tandem on how businesses must act -- and react -- across their markets.

Explore how the agility goal of real-time responses is no longer good enough. What’s apparent across more business ecosystems is that businesses must do even better, to become so data-driven that they extend their knowledge and ability to react well into the future. In other words, we're now all entering the era of the predictive business.

To learn more about how heightened competition amid a data revolution requires businesses and IT leaders to adjust their thinking to anticipate the next, and the next, and the next moves on their respective chess boards, join Tim Minahan, the Chief Marketing Officer for SAP Cloud, and moderator Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: SAP Cloud is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: It’s hard to believe that the pace of business agility continues to accelerate. Tim, what’s driving this time-crunch? What are some of the changes afoot that require this need for -- and also enabling the capabilities to deliver on -- this notion of predictive business? We're in some sort of a rapid cycle of cause and effect, and it’s rather complicated.

Minahan: This is certainly not your father’s business environment. Big is no longer a guarantee to success. If you just look at the past 10 years, 40 percent of the Fortune 500 was replaced. So the business techniques and principles that worked 10, 5 or even three years ago are no longer relevant. In fact, they maybe a detriment to your business.

Minahan
Just ask companies like Tower Records, Borders Bookstore, or any of the dozens more goliaths that were unable or unwilling to adapt to this new empowered customer or to adapt new business models that threatened long-held market structures and beliefs.

The world, as you just said, is changing so unbelievably fast that the only constant is change. And to survive, businesses must constantly innovate and adapt. Just think about it. The customer today is now more connected and more empowered and more demanding.

You have one billion people in social networks that are talking about your brand. In fact, I was just reading a recent study that showed Fortune 100 companies were mentioned on social channels like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn a total of 10.5 million times in one month. These comments are really shaping your brand image. They're influencing your customer’s views and buying decisions, and really empowering that next competitor.

But the consumer, as you know, is also mobile. There are more than 15 billion mobile devices, which is scary. There are twice as many smart phones and tablets in use than there are people on the planet. It’s changing how we share information, how we shop, and the levels of service that customers expect today.

It’s also created, as you stated, a heck of a lot of data. More data was created in the last 18 months than had been created since the dawn of mankind. That’s a frightening fact, and the amount of data on your company, on your consumer preferences, on buying trends, and on you will double again in the next 18 months.

Changing consumer

The consumer is also changing. We're seeing an emerging middle class of five billion consumers sprouting up in emerging markets around the world. Guess what? They're all unwired and connected in a mobile environment.

What's challenging for your business is that you have a whole new class of millennials entering the workforce. In fact, by next year, nearly half of the workforce will have been born after 1980 -- making me feel old. These workers just grew up with the web. They are constantly mobile.

These are workers that shun traditional business structures of command-and-control. They feel that information should be free. They want to collaborate with each other, with their peers and partners, and even competitors. And this is uncomfortable for many businesses.

For this always on, always changing world, as you said, real time just isn’t enough anymore. Knowing in real time that your manufacturing plant went down and you won’t be able to make the holiday shipping season -- it’s just knowing that far too late. Or knowing that your top customer just defected to your chief competitor in real time is knowing that far too late. Even learning that your new SVP of sales, who looks so great on paper, is an awful fit with your corporate culture or your go-to-market strategy is just knowing that far too late.

But to your point, what disrupts can also be the new advantage. So technology, cloud, social, big data, and mobile are all changing the face of business. The need is to exploit them and not to be disrupted by them.

Gardner: How does a predictive business create a whole greater than the sum of the parts when we think about this total shift going on?
Too often, we get enamored with the technology side of the story, but the biggest change that’s going to occur in business is going to be the culture change.

Minahan: I want to be clear here that the predictive business isn't just about advanced analytics. It’s not just about big data. That’s certainly a part of it, but just knowing something is going to happen, just knowing about a market opportunity or a pending risk just isn’t enough.

You have to have that capacity and insight to assess a myriad of scenarios to detect the right course of action, and then have the agility in your business processes, your organizational structures, and your systems to be able to adapt to capitalize on these changes.

Too often, we get enamored with the technology side of the story, but the biggest change that’s going to occur in business is going to be the culture change. There's  the need to adapt to this new millennial workforce and this new empowered customer and the need to reach this new emerging middle-class around the world.

In today’s fast-paced business world, companies really need to be able to predict the future with confidence, assess the right response, and then have the agility organizationally and systems-wise to quickly adapt their business processes to capitalize on these market dynamics and stay ahead of the competition.

They need to be able to harness the insights of disruptive technologies of our day, technologies like social, business networks, mobility, and cloud to become this predictive business.

Not enough

Gardner: Tim, you and I have been talking for several years now about the impact of cloud. We were also trying to be predictive ourselves and to extrapolate and figure out where this is going. I think it turns out that it’s been even more impactful than we thought.

Minahan: The original discussion was all about total cost of ownership (TCO). It was all about the cost benefits of the cloud. While the cloud certainly offers a cost advantage, the real benefit the cloud brings to business is in two flavors -- innovation and agility.
There's now the agility at the business level to configure new business processes without costly IT or consulting engagements.

You're seeing rapid innovation cycles, albeit incremental innovation updates, several times per year that are much more digestible for a company. They can see something coming, be able to request an innovation update, and have their technology partner several times a year adapt and deliver new functionality that’s immediately available to everyone.

Then there's now the agility at the business level to configure new business processes without costly IT or consulting engagements. With some of the more advanced cloud platforms, they can even create their own process extensions to meet the unique needs of their industry and their business.

You're already seeing examples of the predictive business in action across industries today. Leading companies are turning that combination of insight, the big data analytics, and these agile computing models and organizational structures into entirely new business models and competitive advantage.
Strategic marketing

Let’s just look at some of these examples. Take Cisco, where their strategic marketing organization not only mines historical data around what prompted people to buy, or what they have bought, and what were their profiles. They married that with real-time social media mentions to look for customers, ferret out customers, who reveal a propensity to buy and a high readiness to buy.

They then arm their sales team, push these signals out to their sales force, and recommended the right offer that would likely convert that customer to buy. That had a massive impact. They saw a sales uplift of more than $4 billion by bringing all of those activities together.

It’s not just in the high-tech sector. I know we talk about that a lot, but we see it in other industries like healthcare. Mount Sinai Hospital in New York examined the historical treatment approaches, survival rates, and the stay duration of the hospitals to determine the right treatments to optimize care and throughput a patient.

It constantly runs and adapts simulations to optimize its patients first 8-12 hours in the hospital. With improved utilization based on those insights and the ability to adapt how they're handling their patients, the hospital not only improved patient health and survival rates, but also achieved the financial effect of adding hundreds of new beds without physically adding one.

In fact, if you look at it, the whole medical industry is built on predictive business models using the symptoms of millions of patients to diagnose new patients and to determine the right courses of action.
So all around us, businesses are beginning to adapt and take advantage of these predictive business models.

Closer to home for you Dana, there is also an example of the predictive business, I don’t know if you've read Nate Silver's phenomenal book, "The Signal and the Noise," but he talks about going beyond Moneyball, and how the Boston Red Sox were using predictive systems that really have changed how baseball drafts rookie players.

The difference between Moneyball and rookies is that rookies don’t have a record in the pros. There's no basis from which to determine what their on-base percentage will be or how they will perform. But this predictive model goes beyond standard statistics here and looks at similar attributes of other professional players to determine who are the right candidates that they should be recruiting and projecting what their performance might be based on a composite of other players that have like-attributes.

Their first example of this on the Red Sox was with Dustin Pedroia, who no one wanted to recruit. They said he was too short, too slow, and not the right candidate to play second base. But using this new model, the Red Sox modeled him against previous players and found out some of the best second basemen in the world actually have similar attributes.

So they wanted to take him early in the draft. The first year, he took the rookie of the year title in 2007 and helped the Red Sox win the world series for only the second time, since 1918. He's gone on to win the MVP the following year, and he’s been a top all star performer ever since.

So all around us, businesses are beginning to adapt and take advantage of these predictive business models.

Change in thinking

Gardner: It's curious that when you do take a data-driven approach, you have to give up some of the older approaches around intuition, gut instinct, or some of the metrics that used to be important. That really requires you to change your thinking and, rather than go to the highest paid person’s opinion when you need to make a decision, it's really now becoming more of a science.

So what do you get Tim when you do this correctly? What do businesses get when they become more data-driven, when they adjust their culture, take advantage of some of the new tools, and recognize the shift, the consumer behavior? How impactful can this be?

Minahan: It can be tremendously impactful. We truly believe that you get a whole new world of business. You get a business model and organizational and systems infrastructure that has the ability to adapt to all the massive transformation and the rapid changes that we discussed earlier. We believe the predictive business will transform every function within the enterprise and across the value chain.

Just think of sales and marketing. Sales and marketing professionals will now be empowered to engage customers like never before by tapping into social activity, buying activity on business networks, and geo-location insights to identify prospects and develop optimal offers and engage and influence perspective customers right at the point of purchase.
It can be tremendously impactful. We truly believe that you get a whole new world of business.

I think of pushing offers, coupons, to mobile devices of prospective buyers based on their social finger print and their actual physical location or service organizations. We talk about this Internet of things. We haven’t even scratched a surface on this, but they can massively drive customer satisfaction and loyalty to new levels by predicting and proactively resolving potential product or service disruption even before they happen.

Think about your device being able to send a signal and demonstrate a propensity to break down in the future. It may be possible to send a firmware update to fix it without your even knowing.

That’s the power that we’ve already seen with this type of thing in the supply chain. Procurement, logistics and supply chain teams are now being alerted to potential future risks in their sub-tier supply chains and being guided to alternative suppliers based on optimal resolutions and community-generated ratings and buying patterns of like buyers on a business network. We've talked about that in the past.

We really believe that the future of business is the predictive business. The predictive business is not going to be an option going forward. It's not a luxury. It will be what's required not only to win, but eventually, to survive. Your customers are demanding it, your employees are requiring it, and your livelihood is going to depend on it.

The need to adapt

Gardner: Given there is so much complexity, so many moving parts, to take into account, how can larger organizations start to evolve to be predictive?

Minahan: Number one is that you can't have the fear of change. You need to set that aside. At the outset of this discussion, we talked about changes all around us, whether it's externally, with the new empowered consumer who is more informed and connected than ever before, or internally with a new millennial workforce that’s eager to look at new organizational structures and processes and collaborate more, not just with other employees but their peers, and even competitors, in new ways.

That's number one, and probably the hardest thing. On top of that, this isn't just a single technology role. You need to be able to embrace a lot of the new technologies out there. When we look at one of the attributes of an enabling platform for the predictive business, it really comes down to a few key areas.
You have assess multiple scenarios and determine the best course of action faster than ever before.

You need the convenience and the agility of the cloud, improved IT resources and use basically everything as a service -- apps, infrastructure, and platform. You can dial up the capabilities, processing power, or the resource that you need, quickly configure and adapt your business processes at the business level, without massive IT or consulting engagements. Then, you have to have the agility to use some of these new-age cloud platforms to create your own and differentiated business processes and applications.

The second thing is that it's critically important to gather those new insights and productivity, not just from social networks but from business networks, with new rich data sources, from real time market and customer sentiments, through social listening and analytics, the countless bits and histories of transactional and relationship data available on robust business networks.

Then, you have to manage all of this. You also need to advance your analytical capabilities. You need the power and speed of big data, in-memory analytics platforms, and exploiting new architectures like Hadoop and others to enable companies to aggregate, correlate and assess just countless bits of information that are available today and doubling every 18 months.

You have assess multiple scenarios and determine the best course of action faster than ever before. Then, ultimately, one of the major transformational shifts, which is also a big opportunity, is that you need to be able to assess and deliver with ease all of this information to mobile devices.

This is true whether it's your employees who can engage in a process and get insights where they are in the field or whether it's your customer you need to reach, either across the street or halfway around the globe. So the whole here is greater than the sum of the parts. Big data alone is not enough. Cloud alone is not enough. You need all of these enabling technologies working together and leveraging each other. The next-generation business architecture must marry all of these capabilities to really drive this predictive business.

Next generation

Gardner: So clearly at SAP Cloud, you will be giving us a lot of thought. I think you appreciate the large dimension of this, but also the daunting complexity that’s faced in many companies. I hope in our next discussion, Tim, we can talk a little bit about some of the ideas you have about what the next generation of business services platform and agility capability that gets you into that predictive mode would be. Maybe you could just give us a sense very quickly now about the direction and role that an organization like SAP Cloud would play?

Minahan: SAP, as you know, has had a history of helping business continually innovate and drive this next wave of productivity and unlock new value and advantage for the business. The company is certainly building to be this enabling platform and partner for this next wave of business. It's making the right moves both organically and otherwise to enable the predictive business.

If you think about the foundation we just went through and then marry it up against, where SAP is invested and innovated, it's now the leading cloud provider for businesses. More business professionals are using cloud solutions from SAP than from any other vendor.
The company is certainly building to be this enabling platform and partner for this next wave of business.

It's leapt far ahead in the world of analytics and performance with the next generation in-memory platform in HANA. It's the leader in mobile business solutions and social business collaboration with Jam, and as we discussed right here on your show, it now owns the world’s largest and most global business network with the acquisition of Ariba.

That’s more than 1.2 million connected companies transacting over half a trillion dollars worth of commerce, and a new company joining every two minutes to engage, connect, and get more informed to better collaborate. We're very, very excited about the promise of the predictive business and SAPs ability to deliver and innovate on the platform to enable it.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: SAP Cloud.

You may also be interested in:

at 3:36 PM 0 comments
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)